Problem
CONFIDENTIAL
-
29
Preferred Redraft
Possible Channels
(F) Miscellaneous
Art. 159: The present Chinese draft does not specifically address the question of
"inconsistency" of existing laws
and legal documents with the BL
(e.g. references to the Crown
which may have escaped notice
during the adaptation
exercise). It should be made
clear that such inconsistencies
do not constitute sufficient
grounds for the invalidation of
the relevant law or legal document on the pretext of
contravention of the BL. On the
other hand, the existing English
text has gone too far in the
other direction in tackling this
problem by declaring outright
that mere inconsistencies with
the BL will render an SAR law or
legal document invalid.
To revise this article as follows :
"
Upon the establishment of the HKSAR,
the laws previously in force in HK shall be adopted as laws of the Region except for those which the Standing Committee of the
NPC declares to be in contravention of this
Law. The laws so adopted shall be
interpreted in a manner which is consistent
with this Law. If the laws are later
discovered to be in contravention of this
Law, they shall be revised or cease to have
force in accordance with the procedure as prescribed by this Law.
Documents, certificates, contracts,
and rights and obligations valid under the
laws previously in force in HK shall continue to be valid and be recognised and
protected by the HKSAR, and shall be, as
far as possible, interpreted in a manner
which is consistent with the Law."
CONFIDENTIAL
- legal experts channel
BLDC interlocutor: Maria Tam
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.