TNAG-1850-FCO40-2625-House-of-Commons-Select-Committee-on-Foreign-Affairs-enquiry-1989 — Page 84

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

1989-06-12 19:38 COI RADIO TECH SERVICES.

01928 8607

P.10

TRANSCRIPT C: SELECT COMMITTER ON HONG KONG

12 JUNE 1989

MR.

IAN TAYLOR:

Sir David, Can we just be a little more precise on

thie moral obligation?

Would it be fair to say that anyone who arrived in

Hong Kong after 1962, which was the year of the

Commonwealth Immigrants Act in this country, could not

have expected there to be, under any circumstances, the

right of abode attached to a British passport?

SIR DAVID WILSON:

That is the practical state of affairs.

That right

of movement was taken away in 1962. I do not suppose

that people travelling or people being born after that

actually looked at in a rather rational way like that.

MR. IAN TAYLOR:

That may not be the case and these questions are

always difficult to put, but I think they have to be put,

given that moral obligations can themselves be rather

difficult to define, and I am really saying: has it been

recognised in Hong Kong that anyone who arrived there

post-1982 has always understood that there would not be a

right to abode in this country?

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.