to allow maximum time for third countries to get used to the new nationality status. The new BN (0) status will be acquired by former Hong Kong BDTCs only if they obtain a British passport in that
status before 1 July 1997. The Government launched a major
diplomatic campaign to secure worldwide acceptance of the new
document as a fully valid British passport. No country has said that it will not recognise the new BN (O) pasport.
57. The position of the Chinese Government as stated in the Chinese
Memorandum is that all Hong Kong Chinese compatriots are Chinese
nationals.
nationals (previously called BDTCS) who hold British travel
documents may continue to use them after 30 June 1997. Such persons
will not of course be entitled to British consular protection in the
Hong Kong SAR or in other parts of China.
But the Memorandum also states that those Chinese
58.
Neither the BDTC passport nor the BN (0) passport confers upon
the holder the right of abode in the United Kingdom (although he is
entitled to enter this country without a visa for visits of up to three months). Hong Kong people first became subject to UK
immigration control under the Commonwealth Immigrants Act 1962. The
Immigration Act of 1971, which defined "right of abode" for the first time, in essence granted that right to those British nationals with direct links with the UK. Most Hong Kong British nationals did
not qualify for the right of abode in the UK. The British Nationality Act 1981, which created the status of BDTC, did not affect the existing position concerning immigration control and the right of abode. The fact that Hong Kong people are subject to UK immigration control and do not have right of abode here is thus not
new.
59. Despite the importance which Hong Kong people attach to a clear recognition by the Government of the United Kingdom's responsibility for and special connection with Hong Kong, most Hong Kong people
accept the reality of the situation. There have nevertheless been some calls for Hong Kong passport holders to be given right of abode in the United Kingdom, and comparisons have been made with treatment by Portugal of its nationals in Macao. It has been argued that such a move would serve as a sanction against any violation of the Joint
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.