サ
CONFIDENTIAL
FM HONG KONG
TO IMMEDIATE FCO
TELNO 223
OF 20110OZ JANUARY 89
CONFIDENTIAL
19
006514
MDHIAN 9306
MKB 011/30
L
४
4
16
YRTELNOS 180-182: FOREIGN AFFAIRS COMMITTEE ENQUIRY INTO HONG KONG
1.
THANK YOU FOR THE USEFUL INFORMATION IN TURS. SURPRISINGLY, THE FAC ANNOUNCEMENT WAS NOT PICKED UP OVERNIGHT BY THE MEDIA. IF AND WHEN WE ARE ASKED FOR OUR REACTION WE WILL MAKE AN APPROPRIATE RESPONSE TO THE EFFECT THAT WE SEE THIS AS EVIDENCE OF PARLIAMENT'S
CONTINUING INTEREST IN HONG KONG AND WILL CO-OPERATE FULLY AS REQUIRED.
2. IT WOULD BE USEFUL TO HAVE YOUR ADVICE ON WHAT SORT OF REQUESTS THE COMMITTEE MIGHT MAKE FOR HKG INVOLVEMENT AND THE PARAMETERS WITHIN WHICH IT WOULD BE RIGHT TO REACT. I NOTE FROM THE ENQUIRY ON
GIBRALTAR HELD IN 1980-81 THAT THE FAC VISITED GIBRALTAR AND HELD MEETINGS WITH THE GOVERNOR, THE CHIEF MINISTER, OTHER SENIOR MINISTERS AND SEVERAL COMMUNITY ORGANISATIONS. NEITHER THE GOVERNOR NOR THE CHIEF MINISTER GAVE FORMAL EVIDENCE: BUT BOTH SUBMITTED MEMORANDA ON SPECIFIC ISSUES AND THE CHIEF MINISTER REPLIED IN
WRITING TO QUESTIONS PUT TO HIM BY THE FAC. THE RECORDS OF THE FAC'S
MEETINGS WITH THEM AND OTHERS WERE DEPOSITED IN THE LIBRARY OF THE
HOUSE OF OCOMMONS, BUT WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE REPORT ITSELF.
3. I TAKE IT FROM THIS THAT NEITHER I NOR ANY OF MY OFFICIALS WILL BE
ASKED TO GIVE EVIDENCE, BUT THAT FORMAL RECORDS WILL BE TAKEN OF MEETINGS THAT THE FAC HAVE WITH US DURING THEIR VISIT TO HONG KONG. GRATEFUL FOR ADVICE ON WHETHER THE FAC ARE LIKELY TO PUT WRITTEN
QUESTIONS TO ME AND WHETHER THE HKG WILL BE ASKED, OR WHETHER WE
SHOULD VOLUNTEER, TO SUBMIT WRITTEN EVIDENCE IN SOME FORM OR OTHER.
WOULD I BE RIGHT IN THINKING THAT MOST OF THE DETAILED INFORMATION THAT THE FAC MAY REQUIRE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE FCO?
WILSON
YYYY
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.