TNAG-1828-FCO40-2596-Hong-Kong-legal-practitioners-and-judiciary-Jury-(Amendment-1988 — Page 113

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

CONFIDENTIAL

HUD 373),

низ

143601

MDHOAN 9907

CONFIDENTIAL

FM FCO

TO IMMEDIATE HONG KONG

TELNO 597

OF 011715Z MARCH 88

FOLLOWING PERSONAL FOR GOVERNOR FROM HUM, HKD

SONAL TO

YOUR TELNO 750: MR JUSTICE BARKER

TOP COPY Q DIST ?

1.

LORD BENSON HAS NOW WRITTEN. TWICE MORE TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE, AND IN QUITE INSISTENT TERMS, DRAWING ATTENTION TO THE NEW WAVE OF COMMENT IN HONG KONG SPARKED OFF BY THE EDITORIALS IN

THE HONG KONG LAW JOURNAL. HE SUGGESTS THAT QUOTE IT WILL NOW

BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR COUNSEL, AND FOR PARTIES INVOLVED IN ANY FORM OF LITIGATION WHO APPEAR BEFORE (MR JUSTICE BARKER), TO HAVE CONFIDENCE IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE UNQUOTE.

2. WHILE WE UNDERSTAND THE NEED FOR A THOROUGH CONSIDERATION OF MR JUSTICE BARKER'S POSITION, THE IMPLICATIONS OF SUCH SPECULATION ABOUT THE JUDGE'S FUTURE FOR THE STANDING OF THE

JUDICIARY IN HONG KONG ARE BECOMING INCREASINGLY WORRYING.

IS ALSO BECOMING INCREASINGLY DIFFICULT TO EXPLAIN TO THE

SECRETARY OF STATE WHY NO CONCLUSIONS HAVE YET BEEN REACHED.

I THINK THAT THE SECRETARY OF STATE WILL

IT

BE VERY RELUCTANT TO SEND TO LORD BENSON A FURTHER TEMPORISING

REPLY.

3. IT WOULD BE MOST HELPFUL IF ROBIN MCLAREN AND I COULD

DISCUSS THE MATTER FURTHER WITH YOU AT OUR MEETING ON 7 MARCH. I

BELIEVE THE SECRETARY OF STATE WILL BE HOPING TO LEARN YOUR

CONCLUSIONS WHEN YOU CALL ON HIM ON 21 MARCH. IN THE MEANTIME I

THINK I CAN DO NO LESS THAN SUBMIT TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE A DRAFT LETTER TO LORD BENSON WHICH, WHILE AGAIN ASSERTING THE NEED TO GIVE THE MATTER THE MOST THOROUGH CONSIDERATION, GOES ON

TO SAY THAT HE WILL BE DISCUSSING THE QUESTION WITH YOU WHEN YOU

RETURN TO LONDON LATER IN THE MONTH.

4. A PARTICULAR ASPECT WHICH WE WILL WISH TO DISCUSS WITH YOU IS WHETHER, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY IMPROVEMENT IN BARKER'S MEDICAL CONDITION (TUR), HIS CONDUCT TAKEN AS A WHOLE IS SUCH AS TO CAST SERIOUS DOUBTS AS TO HIS CAPACITY TO CONTINUE TO HOLD HIGH

JUDICIAL OFFICE. IN THE MEANTIME WE WONDER IF THERE IS ANY

SCOPE FOR RELIEVING MR JUSTICE BARKER OF HIS JUDICIAL DUTIES

UNTIL A DECISION IS TAKEN ON HIS FUTURE, PERHAPS BY FINDING HIM

SOME OTHER TASK, EG A REVIEW OF SOME INTERNAL PROCEDURES OF THE COURT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE ROBINSON REPORT.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.