new fileCONFIDENTIAL
370 4
Mr Eifort,
Enter pa
나
8% is
Reference cleady a doctrinal
jurisdictional problem with Anny C. (d) and general "validity " issuer as regards,
Legal Advisers K164f
the
on th
whole arrangement. But, in prostical tema, I doubt whether we want to go back quagenty of for must his with the details ((C)(i) must be retained. HONG KONG: LIAISON WITH GUANGDONG COURTSP. f.
revepy 3 male have seen 379/4/66
You with
subject for quite
flagged
paper fité
are
2. It is
C
O
we
anything long time.
14.v1
this
Relevant
the attached 1987
subject with which
familiar, since it time in HK, (and
was
am
quite running for all of my
they geceded me there!). I discussed
shepin
3.
it briefly with Miss
Grateful if
you
1
was
conte cast
am
eye
has already,
attached Exto Youper. It discussed (or 22 March), but we
the antrame
helpful to
yet.
ure
comm
the
taking any
put
knad
Chinese. (It
HKC.
over the
been
do not knows
think HK
However, it would be
whether you untoward steps, so that we
(It wond
them right before they revert to would always Exlo if necessary).
to resubmit to
4. The hey documents
It
how are
to w
does not seem
that there could be
purticularly
as the
me
as
be possible
Annexes ((d) - (b).
notice of
any objection
HK's past (Annex ((b)) will
CODE 18-78
28th March 1988
legal layman
to
these,
disclaimer on
accompany
senice
wল
HKD
WH304
270 2655
Page 135Page 136
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.