TNAG-1825-FCO40-2592-Hong-Kong-and-the-UK-Criminal-Justice-Bill-Administration-of-1988 — Page 235

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

to the proper addressee.

3

Once

a requisition has reached that

addressee, the various provisions of the Act begin to operate.

If the Act says that for Great Britain the proper addressee is the Secretary of State, we construe section 17 (1) as saying that ✓ for a British possession the proper addressee is the Governor.

We do not construe it as giving a choice between the Secretary of State and the Governor. We believe that this view is supported

by section 17 (2)

to

(4).

"colonial" procedure.

a person in custody in

Middlesex.

These

are setting out

a

different

It would be very peculiar to suggest that

in a colony might be sent to a prison in

The proper place for him is a prison in the colony. The Act goes out of its way to refer to a court "exercising in

the British possession the like powers as

Bench exercises in England".

So far as

we

the Court of Queen's

can see, the Court of

Queen's Bench simply could not operate in relation to somebody in

a

colony.

To

our

the minds

context

in which section 17 (1)

appears points to there being one procedure for securing the If so, it surrender of a fugitive criminal in a colony, not two.

appears to

correct.

us

that the present version of our draft clause is

We appreciate however that your policy might be to provide for circumstances, as you say in paragraph 6 of your letter, in which ✓the Secretary of State might wish, or might have to, exercise his

powers under the Bill in a dependent territory. this would be a new departure.

We spoke about this.

We believe that

What would the circumstances be?

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.