TNAG-1825-FCO40-2592-Hong-Kong-and-the-UK-Criminal-Justice-Bill-Administration-of-1988 — Page 155

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

3

I now turn to international Conventions.

In our efforts, following MacLeod's letter of 8 April, to deal

with the Civil Aviation Act 1982 we became conscious of two

points.

The first of these is as to provisions such as section 3 (3) of

the Internationally Protected Persons Act 1978. There is nothing

wrong with these, and we have now perceived that they should be

left, so far as possible, completely untouched. It is really a

case of adding extra provisions to deal with the new system of

extradition. This principle runs all through the amendments

There is in fact nothing

about international Conventions.

corresponding to section 3 (3) of the 1978 Act in the Civil

Aviation Act, because the problem is dealt with by treating

aircraft as, in effect, part of a country. But we believe that

the idea of adding, rather than amending, applies to all the Acts with which we are concerned. In the case of the Internationally

Protected Persons Act we have had to sent out both the old and

the new extradition provisions.

the form which the Act takes.

But this is simply because of

The other point emerging from perusal of the Civil Aviation Act was simply that we had failed previously to take account of the

Channel Islands, Isle of Man and Colonies.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.