peop have landed in Hong Kong since 16 June.
disappointing, but not unexpected.
This is
It could be that many
of these arrivals set off before the new policy was
announced or before the news filtered through; or that
rumours of the imminent introduction of a tougher policy
prompted a surge of departures in an attempt to get in
before the change. I must therefore conclude that it is
too early to assess the deterrent effect of the new
policy on the basis of the figures so far.
4.
However, since the introduction of the new policy
at
least
(and on draft in part as a consequence of it) there has
been one welcome and potentially significant development.
The Vietnamese authorities have invited all the places of
first asylum to hold bilateral talks with them on
repatriation of non-refugees
an offer which we are of
But
course taking up. The talks will provide us with a good
opportunity to press the Vietnamese to take more
effective action to control illegal departures.
perhaps more importantly, the very fact that talks with
Vietnam on repatriation are taking place should help to
deter those who are contemplating leaving. This, and the
efforts which we and the Hong Kong Government are making
to publicise the new policy in Vietnam, should have a
significant cumulative effect on departure rates over
We shall continue to monitor the situation
time.
carefully.
5. On the question of whether a new commitment of 1,000
would be sufficient to elicit a substantial response from
others, the most convincing evidence for this is a
statement made to us by a very senior US official with
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.