AUG.26 '88 12:13 GMT HO 2 LUNAR HOUSE
directions were given fu
que apu
ad of
?.
juder to do justfor k
* w the
* Domb of view the?
234 be given
in the burnce of a notica "a
west likely be faced with an applianc
en
and 14 14 apriicant fa nel to inderate Dat we te 85
to destrina hep heen goven upsa na epyl.nation for #y whatever day by that Pgal berite of his spelthevica for 4. conley, be will be likely to receive (save to move it in to hot But whether s Aecialon has been beken. Some of WIC PROBE
before wa waze enverlag of this sort of albataon.
westen
giving the applicant reasons for the dealston, Mr. Lews 414 not give any seurance to the Cours. Again, we deal chlaged to say that in our view it would be preferable, even 12 a Member of Parliament is not evolved, that in a baut ut an application for asylum reasons for the decision to refuse an application ere given to an applicant. An immigrert may find it difficult to pes the justification for taking one view where a Macber of Parliament is involved end a different view where Mezbar
of Par34ument has not been involved. Having regard to the importance of the decision, which has been made clear by the House of Lords, it is surely destrable that before a court of sation de taken against an individual which he contende ovule
di
endanger his life he is told why the estion de being taken
આ છ
Short ressons are given when a person is refused entry sa f
aa
vistyor ve how can it be right to give no reasons when a pac.i
do ix refused sayive? Again, in addition to the requirements of Justice er talement practical considerat10. A
dagdrobit of giving Taws as Reasons day present wMASINA DOTY dous applications and, when sade, /t the Court lows the reasons for the decision then there is at least a rest prospect of en
13.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.