TNAG-1752-FCO40-2472-Future-of-Hong-Kong-Parliamentary-debates-1988 — Page 47

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

90

CONFIDENTIAL

001560

MDHIAN 1587

CONFIDENTIAL

FM HONG KONG

TO DESKBY 11090OZ FCO

TELNO 1056

OF 110745Z MARCH 88

INFO IMMEDIATE PEKING

FROM MCLAREN

89

HKB 040/2

TOP COPY Q DIST ?

HONG KONG TELNO 1033: CONSOLIDATED FUND DEBATE IN THE HOUSE OF

COMMONS

1

·

KE ZAISHUO HAD A BRIEF WORD WITH ME DURING A BREAK IN THIS

MORNING'S JLG SESSION. HE SAID THAT MADAM ZHANG YOUYUN HAD REPORTED

WHAT HUM HAD TOLD HER ABOUT THE DEBATE STIMULATED BY MR MAREK. HE

QUITE UNDERSTOOD THAT THIS WAS A VERY MINOR EVENT BUT HE DID WANT

TO DRAW MY ATTENTION TO THE NATIONAL SENSITIVITIES INVOLVED IN CHINA.

THE BASIC LAW WAS AN INTERNAL CHINESE MATTER AND PEOPLE ON THE MAINLAND WOULD FIND IT DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND IF FOREIGN PARLIAMENTS

STARTED DEBATING IT. HE HOPED WE WOULD WORK ON THE MPS SO THAT THEY UNDERSTOOD THE SENSITIVITIES, AND WOULD HAVE REGARD FOR THEM IN WHAT WE OURSELVES SAID.

2. I SAID THAT AS KE KNEW WE COULD NOT TELL MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT

WHAT THEY SHOULD OR SHOULD NOT DISCUSS (HE NODDED IN AGREEMENT).

BUT HE WOULD NOTICE THAT SPOKESMEN FOR THE GOVERNMENT WERE ALWAYS

CAREFUL TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE DRAFTING OF THE BASIC LAW WAS A

MATTER FOR CHINA IN ANYTHING THEY SAID ON THE SUBJECT.

COMMENT

3

KE RAISED THE QUESTION IN A MILD AND UNCONTROVERSIAL MANNER AND

I HAD THE IMPRESSION THAT HE MIGHT NOT HAVE DONE SO AT ALL IF WE HAD

NOT BEEN TALKING ABOUT SOMETHING ELSE. THIS SUGGEST THAT THE CHINESE

MAY HAVE TAKEN ON BOARD THE POINT THAT OVER REACTION WOULD BE

COUNTERPRODUCTIVE. THEY MIGHT NONETHELESS FEEL OBLIGED TO SAY

SOMETHING MORE FORMAL IF THERE ARE CALLS FOR A PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE

SPECIFICALLY ON THE SUBJECT OF THE BASIC LAW.

FORD

YYYY

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.