TNAG-1748-FCO40-2467-Visit-by-Sir-Geoffrey-Howe--Secretary-of-State-for-Foreign-a-1988 — Page 155

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

ARZADB (4)

RESTRICTED

(iv) BASIC LAW

Inconsistency with Joint Declaration?

Drafting of Basic Law responsibility of Chinese Government. But we will wish to satisfy ourselves that Basic Law accurately reflects provisions of Joint Declaration.

Studying draft carefully. If there are any points we

consider to be inconsistent with Joint Declaration, will make our

views known to Chinese authorities.

Pay close attention to views of Hong Kong people, as

reflected to us by Hong Kong Government.

Is Parliamentary debate on Basic Law appropriate?

Natural that Parliament might want to discuss such an

important issue. For Parliament to decide.

Parliament has a right to discuss whether Joint Declaration of which we are signatories, is accurately reflected in Basic Law.

Is LegCo debate appropriate?

Interest of LegCo members in Basic Law is natural and

understandable.

LegCo debate offers one means for members to make their

personal views known.

[If asked]. See no reason why HMG should not pass to Chinese authorities record of discussion of Basic Law in LegCo.

BLCC's refusal to accept views from Government organisations?

It is for BLCC to decide how it will collect views of Hong

Kong people.

What is important is willingness of Chinese Government to consider views from all quarters, however conveyed to them.

Will JLG discuss Basic Law?

A variety of channels open to us.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.