Clauses 3 and 4, 8, 9, 13 and 16
MR. MARTIN LEE :
(3)
stet
Sir, I move that the clauses 3, 4, 8, 9, 13 and 16 be
amended as set out in the paper circulated under my name
to Members. Clause 3, in its unamended form clause 3(1)(b) reads rather the Attorney General is of the opinion that
the evidence of the offence reveals a case of
case of fraud,
or dishonesty in the commercial contact, Z
and
→
Leontact, Z of such /context
that it seriousness complexity There is appropriate that
Stanojon
persua at
ansfer to the court purquanee
it be
to this Ordinance, the
Attorney General may apply to the magistracy for an order
transferring the proceedings to the
Comuna
court!! The
presence of af after the word 'fraud' would cause a break to this
to this phrase with the, result that although a case
of dishonesty would not fall within this section unless
the dishonesty is in the commercial context, a case of
fraud need not be related in any way to a commercial
copina
context. But once a
Z is removed, then whether the case
in question involved fraud or dishonesty, this section
will not apply to it, unless the fraud
it, unless the fraud or dishonesty is
До
le
related to a commercial context.Although we are talking le.
comma,
about the it does make a lot of difference, Sir, this
XZ
can be said the most misguided and misplaced comma I have
ever come across. So I proposed to have it removed. The
next
amendment concerns
the last few words
2
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.