accident, it would be difficult to identify the source.
In fact, each substance contains chemicals. Why can we
bock
well not stipulate that the chemical name be labelled and the
the commonly used name be labelled altogether?
name only used
commen
ee exist?
as
a secondary label of they can
Fourth, regarding container
that can be exempted from
Regulation 7 stipulates that a container that holds a
substance produced in the industrial undertaking which is,
not intended to be used there but to be used elsewhere can
be exempted from the regulations. The trade unions and
the organisations feel that they have not strong enough
reasons for such exemptions. Firstly, in the production
of dangerous mixtures, they usually use in
no
large
regulation
are regimd
who are
Those in
eregind
to
the potential danger is great. quantities and came to
cont
contact with or handling such substances have the right to
Their substances
be seek
know the extent, of the danger So that they can adequate protections. ade protected Secondly, should such
containers be exempted
from labelling, then transport workers, factory operators
will and workers who have to handle such substances may be
quite ignorant of the danger and
them
consequently will not
handle this with care. Besides, regulation 7 also says
about containers holding less than 125 mm or above half
glass
teaspoonful of dangerous mixtures
~en~
which are explosive,
non~.
ト
corrosive or
those
WD
de inflammable and, do not contain/more
con
than 1
per cent of any toxic substance can be exempted.
Trade
unions and organisations feel that certain
toxic
substances, for instance, cyanide, even if these is only 1
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.