But one
important
Committee has still
point taken by the Bar
not been satisfactorily resolved.
That relates to the right of a person believed to be
suffering from mental disorder to be heard by a judge or
magistrate when he is detained or before he is detained in
a mental hospital under section 31. As the Bar Committee
put it: "It is important to preserve the civil rights and
freedoms of every individual
this territory
irrespective of his affliction with any particular type of
disability."
in
this year
Indeed, this point has caused great concern to
members of the ad hoc group as well as other Members of
this Council. According to the record of the in-house
meeting held on Friday, 3 June
"some Members.
felt in order to safeguard human rights, it was essential
for a person to be heard by a magistrate or a judge before
he was deprived of his liberty. However, some Members
felt that it might give rise to practical difficulties and
such an additional safeguard could cause delays in
providing timely medical treatment to the patient. After
further deliberation, Members agreed that bearing in mind
possible practical difficulties which the Administration
would have to sort out, the ad hoc group's recommendation
that a person suspected to be a mental patient should be
given the right to
right to be heard before
before being detained in a
mental hospital under section 31 should be supported in
principle."
Page 120Page 121
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.