TNAG-1729-FCO40-2442-Minutes-and-Hansards-of-the-Legislative-Council-of-Hong-Kong-1988 — Page 242

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

14

to the corporation for consideration.

It is a technical

matter and I do not know the details of the Singapore

system

and

will

find out from the corporation.

there. is

a clear

May I reiterate that

need to divert passengers away from the peak of the peak

hours to earlier hours to avoid overcrowding in the trains

at those hours, and this is the main point at issue.

MR. EDWARD HO:

Sir,

I agree with Mrs. Selina

CHOW and Mr. SOHMEN that reducing the non-peak fare as

an incentive is more effective than a surcharge, and

I am not satisfied with the Secretary's replies

because if

revenue

hours is so high,

а

from

slight

non-peak

increase

in

would

the general fare in- non-peak hours

give the MTRC a very attractive incentive to reduce.

the fares in the peak hours.

SECRETARY FOR TRANSPORT:

Sir, this point again has been

raised before. The MTRC considers, and I agree, that to

raise fares artificially to hide this question of congestion

element is unfair and dishonest and unjust. The corporation

does not want to do this. It wants to show t

that

to to show the public

clearly they have a choice and the fares are not inflated

because of this and the fares are applied to only the

congestion hours and passengers have a choice to use it or

It is not a

not. And this is its stand on the matter.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.