1
2
3
HE
DE COArad LAM
DR. LAM [in Cantonese] :
Sir,
4
10
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
24
2.5
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
lc. 35
during these two days, within this Chamber, many Members
in this Chamber have praised the White Paper The White Paper is able to obtain the support of a many of my colleagues. Of course, it is because they think some points inside
However, the White Paper are good. At the same time, we
such a should ponder why this White Paper has received an historical treatment from the public. Different groups of people, at various public occasions, burned the White Paper to show their very great disappointment. Now, just outside the Chamber of Legislative Council,
IS there is a group of post-secondary students new staging a 38-hour fasting to protest the contents of the White
against
Paper. In fact, most of the University students, as well as post-secondary college students/are not happy with the White Paper. They are the future leaders of our society and they are the elite of our community why are they unhappy with the White Paper? This deserves an open as well as sincere Administration to show concern as well as to think
about it.
30
Generally speaking, the proposals
of the White Paper are short-sighted and incomplete. It gives people an impression that it is a very cautious and passive document. In 1984, the Government clearly gave us a timetable for the development of representative government, including the relationship between the Legislative Council and the Executive Council, and
1988
Le
mentioned
H
le la n
welhas the constitution of Executive Council. Nevertheless,
the White Paper 1988- has notword about these topics. The timetable for constitutional development is only up to 1991, Amly. For A confident as well as and open government they should have a concrete and
36 long-term constitutional development plan.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.