TNAG-1726-FCO40-2439-Minutes-and-Hansards-of-the-Legislative-Council-of-Hong-Kong-1988 — Page 129

الله

1

2

3

4

Sc 5

ON

6

7

8

Je 9

10

11

12

the district boards.

of B.B.9. What happened to their original accusation that the #lectoral College was not truly democratic because it was unrepresentative, and therefore unaccountable to the public.

#

Sir, I stand opposed to Mr Szeto Wah's proposed amendment because it lacks logic, and because I believe it is motivated by political strategy rather than by will, to arrive at a better system for Hong Kong. Sir, before I sit down may I say I deplore the language used by Mr. Szeto in his speech just now; one can always hide behind a shield of the freedom of speech and freedom of expression, but how low can you stoop?

Sir, I stand opposed to the amendment.

HIS EXCELLENCY.

13

14

15

16

17

18

Mr. Szeto.

19

MR. CHAN

Mr. Chan Ying-Lun?

Sir, I oppose the proposed amendment by

In the debate on these two days now, unlike the debate on the B.N.O. because for the B.N.O. debate the in-house of LEGCO

agreed that

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 72

· 30

31

33

34

35

36