6.
supplementary to Question No.8
Lagca meeting on 3 February 1988
Mr. MARTIN LEE: Sir, may I respectfully seek a ruling from
you because I do not, with respect, think that the Chief
Secretary has answered my question. The question was based
on a disclosure of fact made to Parliament as recently as
20 January this year
which took the hon. Member of
Parliament then on his feet, Sir Peter Blaker, as much by
public surprise as it took me, listening to it up in the gallery.
on 18
February
What the Chief Secretary said was simply to refer to his own
speech made in this Council
last year
when there was no such disclosure of fact. So may I
respectfully ask you to direct him to answer my question?
HIS EXCELLENCY THE PRESIDENT: Mr. LEE, it is unwise for the
chair to make a ruling about whether answers are adequate or
not. It is always open to a Member of this Council to ask
further questions. It must be for those who answer to judge
the adequacy or otherwise of their answers. If you wish
to ask a further supplementary question, you may of course
do so.
сар.
Mr. MARTIN LEE: Sir, such a non-answer makes the asking of
supplementary questions very difficult but I will try. Does the Administration appreciate that the relevant question
copied by AGB McNair HK Ltd. from the Green Paper, consisted of 251 words in English and 368 characters in Chinese, and
yet still failed to ask the simple question as to whether the
people polled would like to see direct elections introduced in 1988?
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.