TNAG-1724-FCO40-2437-Minutes-and-Hansards-of-the-Legislative-Council-of-Hong-Kong-1988 — Page 104

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

to 1991 are not issues to

be discussed today. What we

should discuss. is if we do pass this Bill today what

merits will there be and if we do not

we do not pass it

pass it today what

demerits will there be.

The Government probably can be criticised on the

this timing of this Bill but I feel that even in that

Government should not be

particular

criticised.

aspect the

The Government plans to do way with the link

in 1989 and to replace it with the link that goes upward.

Therefore in intarducing the Bill everything was above

created personal problems

in deciding whether

whether they

board. That perhaps may have may have

for certain Urban Councillors

should run

run for election

election or not, but after all those have

therefore

Λ

these are

very personal decisions. And so I would like to appeal to

my colleagues here and ask them to pass this particular

Bill.

Mr.

Hilton

CHEONG-LEEN

has

talked

about

amendments that will probably make it easier for Urban

Councillors. But if we do

do not pass this Bill

this Bill today, we

may create two possible problems.

One, if the Government

introduces certain amendments that will change the

candidates

procedure, that is, after the deadline, they can still

withdraw. Then there may be requests

for reasons that

^

A

for a change of

election schedule sinée certain Urban Councillors are now

joining the elections or certain councillors are not

withdrawing from the elections.

If

the Government does

tos.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.