TNAG-1690-FCO40-2340-Hong-Kong-legislation-regarding-the-control-of-publications--1987 — Page 112

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

1 sense without reference to professional experts. Nobody

~ 2

2 would ask a dietician to analyse the nutrition value of a

meal before taking it.

3

If we know what food is good for

4 our body we should also be able to determine what publications

5 are good for our mind and soul. We want creative work which

เก

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

2 2 2

23

25

26

27

28

4

is freely expressed and which is not inhibited by excessive restrictions. Any steps which move towards political censorship, whether. real or imaginary, will be viewed with suspicion by the people of Hong Kong, particularly at this sensitive time. Some people are mindful about possible reactions from China. I accept that we should improve communication and mutual understanding with the mainland, but we must present the true position of Hong Kong to the Chinese authorities so that they understand the Hong Kong people and how we operate the place. It is wrong to anticipate what the Chinese leaders would be happy to see and hear and then do and say things to please them. Such action is measuring a gentleman's stomach with a small man's

heart.(以小人之心度君子之腹 Chinese leaders have repeatedly

stated that people can criticise the communist party. Why should we not be forthcoming with honest views and present the truth to these leaders?- Why is it necessary to exercise self-censorship? The present regulations are 24 intended as a temporary measure. The draft Bill for film

censorship is still in its consultation period with two more to run. This is a golden opportunity to try out whether or not deletion of the so-called political censorship would cause any harm to external relations of Hong Kong. If things run out of control this kind of censorship can be considered for reinstatement in the main legislation otherwise the draft bill should be amended to exclude political censorship. Sir, I would consider contravention of human rights and unnecessary restriction of freedom, not merely as undesirable at this time but as a backward step in human civilisation. With these remarks, sir, I support the motion.

wwwwwww.XNX

36

30

31

32

33

34

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.