CONFIDENTIAL
55002
1
2. WHETHER OR NOT A RESTRICTION ON THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM
OF EXPRESSION FALLS WITHIN THE EXCEPTIONS PERMITTED BY
ARTICLE 19.3 OF THE CONVENTION DEPENDS NOT ONLY ON THE
AUTHORITY BY WHICH IT IS IMPOSED, BUT ON THE PURPOSE FOR
WHICH AND THE CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH IT IS APPLIED. THE
FORMULATIONS UNDER CONSIDERATION ARE
•
(A) (OPEN SQUARE BRACKETS) SET OUT IN THE FORM OF A
CONTINUOUS SENTENCE WITH DOTS AS NECESSARY (CLOSE SQUARE BRACKETS) (THE CURRENT GUIDELINES), AND (B) (OPEN SQUARE BRACKETS) SET OUT IN THE FORM OF A
CONTINUOUS SENTENCE IF NECESSARY WITH DOTS (CLOSE
SQUARE BRACKETS) (THE PROPOSED LEGISLATION).
THESE ARE POWERS, NOT RULES OF LAW AND THEY ARE NOT OF THEMSELVES INCONSISTENT WITH ARTICLE 19.2. WHETHER THEIR
EXERCISE IS CONSISTENT WITH ARTICLE 19.2 WILL DEPEND
UPON :
(I). WHETHER THE POWER IS EXERCISED BECAUSE IT IS NECESSARY TO DO SO, (NEXT TWO WORDS UNDERLINED) INTER ALIA
(I) QUOTE FOR RESPECT OF THE RIGHTS OR REPUTATIONS OF OTHERS UNQUOTE, WHICH MAY BE RELEVANT IN THE CASE OF FILMS ATTACKING PUBLIC (OR PRIVATE) FIGURES IN ANOTHER
COUNTRY.
(II) QUOTE FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL SECURITY UNQUOTE WHICH MAY BE INTERPRETED AS COVERING THE SECURITY
OF HONG KONG WHICH MAY BE EXPOSED TO EITHER EXTERNAL OR
EXTERNALLY INSPIRED THREAT,
PUBLIC ORDER
(III) QUOTE FOR THE PROTECTION OF UNQUOTE WHICH WOULD ALSO BE RELEVANT IF THERE WERE REASON
TO SUSPECT THAT A PARTICULAR FILM COULD LEAD TO PUBLIC
DISTURBANCES OR PUBLIC DISAFFECTION ON THE PART OF LOCAL
PUBLIC OFFICIALS, AND
(II). THE PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE.
3. IN APPLYING THE TESTS AT I (II) AND (III) ABOVE, THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED UNDER THE COVENANT, LIKE THAT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS UNDER THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION, RECOGNISES THAT THE
2
CONFIDENTIAL
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.