TNAG-1687-FCO40-2337-Hong-Kong-legislation-regarding-the-control-of-publications--1987 — Page 216

'87 16:01 TIBCOOL) HK GOVT

4

But two months ago in order to bring our laws into line with the freedoms we practise in Hongkong, we proposed to repeal those draconian lows, and retain only one clause in one piece of legislation which is solely concerned with the maintenance of public order. The removal of the false news provision from the Control of Publications (Consolidation) Ordinance to the Public Order Ordinance is a clear indication that the provision is not meant to limit press or personal freedom but simply safeguard the community from false news which is likely to alarm public opinion or disturb public order. Without doubt, the present formulation of the clause is the most mildly phrased section in all our previous legislation. Sir, we believe this community is entitled to protection from irresponsible reports which have serious consequences for the stability of this territory.

It is for this reason and for this reason alone that we have included this clause in the Public Order Ordinance. It is a measure of last resort. If it is ever used, it will be used sparingly and with particular care. I totally reject every allegation which impugns the motives of the Government in bringing in this clause. Some such as the absurd proposition that we had retained to seek favour with Peking are bizarre to say the least.

P.4