TNAG-1657-FCO40-2305-Daya-Bay-nuclear-power-station-project-safety-concerns-in-Ho-1987 — Page 128

* 051708 PTS

↑ 05183135+

↓ 83135 ATOMHA G

↑ 66336 ESBGS HX

↑ TELEX NO. : 388

TO : HARWELL LABORATORY CATTN: MS JANE SECHER)

C.C

·

DIRECTOR OF ROYAL OBSERVATORY

DIRECTOR OF ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL SERVICES

לא!

Annex D

THANK YOU FOR YOUR LETTER OF 9 SEPTEMBER 1986 ENCLOSING YOUR PROPOSALS IN RESPECT OF THE SUMMARY OF THE CONTINGENCY PLAN REPORT AND EXTENDED PHASE II ACCIDENT ASSESSMENT REPORT.

THE ENCLOSURES TO 2.

DEALING FIRSTLY WITH THE SUMMARY REPORT,

FOR THIS YOUR LETTER DID NOT PROVIDE US WITH ITS PROPOSED STRUCTURE. REASON WE HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO FORM A CLEAR IDEA AS TO EXACTLY WHAT WE WILL BE GETTING FOR THE EXTRA POUNDS STG 45,300 INVOLVED.

3.

IN DR WADE'S LETTER TO US OF 28 0OCTOBER HE PROMISED TO SEND TO US A COPY OF THE OUTLINE OF THE SUMMARY REPORT SHORTLY. IT WOULD BE MOST APPRECIATED IF, WITH THIS OUTLINE, A DETAILED JUSTIFICATION THE PROVISION FOR THE COST OF PRODUCING IT WOULD ALSO BE PROVIDED.

OF THIS INFORMATION WILL BE OF CONSIDERABLE ASSISTANCE TO US IN MAKING OUR CASE FOR SUPPLEMENTARY FUNDS.

IN THE MEANTIME, AND TO AVOID FURTHER DELAY, COULD YOU PLEASE ARRANGE FOR A START TO BE MADE IN THE PREPARATION OF THE SUMMARY REPORT. OUR VIEWS ON THE STRUCTURE, WHILE POSSIBLY HAVING A BEARING ON THE PRESENTATIONAL ASPECTS, SHOULD NOT INFLUENCE THE ACTUAL CONTENT WHICH WILL BASICALLY BE DRAWN FROM YOUR ORIGINAL REPORT AND EXPANDED TO COVER THE ADDITIONAL POINTS DISCUSSED AT

HARWELL IN AUGUST.