TNAG-1642-FCO40-2289-Public-finance-in-Hong-Kong-Supplementary-Appropriation-(198-1987 — Page 320

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

Date:

28.11.86

Time:

8.30

-

12.30

Reporter:

PMS

ve

1 [12.02 pm]

2

3

CHAIRMAN:

The last item on the agenda is paragraph

8 11 of the Director of Audit's Report. May I call on the

4 8 -

5 Commissioner of Inland Revenue to appear before the Committee.

Welcome, good morning.

6

(Pause)

7

8

9

sts

10

CIR:

CHAIRMAN:

Good morning.

We are dealing with Director of Audit's

11, on whether the Inland Revenue Department

11 Report, paragraph 8

12 needs to do more to come back against tax evasion.

S.

13

14

CIR:

Yes, sir.

15

16

CHAIRMAN:

May we start. Mr Peter Poon.

ject?

17

18

MR POON:

Mr Commissioner.

19

20

CIR:

Yes.

21

255

22

23

MR POON:

From the Report of the Director of Audit,

there seems to be a comment that there has been quite few prosecutions

24 in the last 10 years.

27

29

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

25 is fair?

26

Would you enlighten us on whether that comment

CIR:

Yes, Mr Poon. I believe the comment is

28 fair in a sense that for the past 12 years we have had a total of

15 prosecution cases, including this year of course, averaging about 30 one in a year. But the point which I must make it clear is that 31 prosecution is a very serious matter and also getting information to 32 start a prosecution, especially in a tax case, is very difficult 33 indeed. Because of all these factors the number of cases selected 34 for prosecution and presented to court is not as many as I would

35 expect it to be. I would say we start an investigation case right

36

at the beginning to see whether or not the case has possible prosecution

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.