184
Date:
Time:
28.11.86.
8.30
-
12.30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Reporter: PMO
MR CHEONG:
Well, thank you very much. And also, if
possible, while you are looking through the files, we would be interested in any documentary evidence that shows that the contractor had complained or communicated with Government to say that, you know, those drawings are not detailed enough for me to follow a tight
programme.
MR CHEUNG: Well, Sir, you will probably find that the number of items in that correspondence is considerable. It would probably be a very thick file even if extracted from the total
records.
13
14
15
16
MR CHEONG: We are tasked to look into the thing and we
obviously are interested in finding out the truth.
MR CHEUNG: The answer to your question is yes, Government was requested and pressed, for details and detailed drawings but they were slow in coming. Some of it is due to change in scope.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
MR CHEONG:
Well, I accept your word for it.
MR CHEUNG:
But if you would like all the letters
exchanged about this, they will be provided to this Committee.
MR CHEONG:
Thank you.
Mr Chairman, may I ?
CHAIRMAN: Yes.
MR CHEONG:
Another thing that I would like to satisfy
30 within my own mind; on page 10 of the consultant's report,
paragraph 3.4
——
31
32
33
34
35
36
MR CHEUNG: Yes.
MR CHEONG:
it discusses under the heading of "Procedure
for overcoming problems" now, it says that "What concerns the engineer
vas
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.