1
(B)
(C)
BY THE LEGISLATURE.
SECRET
66724
-
1
IN YOUR PARA 13 WE THINK QUOTE THEORETICALLY UNQUOTE IS
OUT OF PLACE (SINCE THE POWERS ARE NOT THEORETICAL). WE
SUGGEST ADDITION OF QUOTE UNILATERALLY UNQUOTE OR
QUOTE AT HIS OWN DISCRETION UNQUOTE BEFORE QUOTE
EXERCISED UNQUOTE WOULD BETTER MEET YOUR POINT.
ON YOUR PARA 16. WE STILL FEEL (PARA (I) OF OUR TELNO 1789) THAT A REFERENCE SHOULD BE INCLUDED TO A POWER OF
PARDON
(D)
4.
AS A FURTHER MOVE TO AVOID THE CONDITIONS OUTLINED IN
YOUR PARA 21 BECOMING JUSTICIABLE. WE SUGGEST ADDITION
AFTER QUOTE PRACTICE UNQUOTE OF QUOTE THOUGH NOT AS A RULE OF LAW. UNQUOTE.
ON YOUR PAPER ON THE EXECUTIVE (YOUR TELNO 2731) OUR ONLY COMMENT IS TO SUGGEST INCLUSION IN PARA 12 OF A REFERENCE IN A
NEW ITEM (F) TO THE POWER OF REMOVAL. SINCE THIS IS THE ULTIMATE
FORM OF ACCOUNTABILITY TO THE LEGISLATURE.
5.
ON YOUR PAPER ON THE LEGISLATURE (YOUR TELNO 2732):
(A)
IN PARA 2. QUOTE ADMINISTRATION UNQUOTE SHOULD OF COURSE
BE QUOTE ADMINISTRATIVE UNQUOTE-
(B)
(a)
WE FEEL THAT YOUR PARA 5 GOES FURTHER THAN WE NEED AT
THIS STAGE AND COULD INADVERTENTLY BE SEEN AS PREJUDGING THE 1987 REVIEW. WE THINK THE SECOND. THIRD AND FOURTH SENTENCES COULD BE OMITTED AND THE FIFTH AMENDED BY ADDING AFTER QUOTE SYSTEM UNQUOTE QUOTE BASED ON GEOGRAPHICAL CONSTITUENCIES UNQUOTE.
REGARDING YOUR PARAS 6 AND 9(A). WE ASSUME THAT YOU WOULD
NOT ENVISAGE THAT THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE WOULD NOMINATE A
2
SECRET
LARGER
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.