TNAG-1585-FCO40-2159-Hong-Kong-prisons-and-prisoners-1986 — Page 137

HKIAJU

}

CORINNEKAJ PONG GOLDENosakkan pitsilasemaa muna suchátka.

Mr Fifoot, Legal Advisers

}

Mr Parris, Consular Department }

HKK 383/1

Reference.

separate copies

Rea

? So abad

previous papers

as for back as possible

pse

COLONIAL PRISONERS REMOVAL ACT 1884

1.

Ch5839 1985 14

My predecessor, Olivia Walker, minuted August about the procedures to be followed when invoked in respect

Hong Kong.

responses

2012

to you on 28 this act is

In the

of light

you r Stone in Hong Kong on

of we wrote (copy attached) to 12 December, whose reply dated 31 January is also attached.

2.

I should be grateful for your letter, by 28 February if possible.

comments on Hong Kong's

Don

19 February 1986

DJ Barton

Hong Kong Department

CK 383.7.

RECEIVED IN RECISTRY

20 FEB 1986

INDEX

PA

STRY

Action Taken.

D

CODE 18-77

AWO Ltd

7/84

minute 20/12

На

(ger:

1. As I understand it

1,

دهید

Simply

discussing f

procedures, and it is for H.K.Department to decide what should be done. lagres that it would seem that most transfers would be under the

wished to remove a prismer againsthi RPA 1984, except where will. But it seems clear Hong Kong has no wish to have the RPA 1984

on the one hand duy extended to them. It seems odd that they should say are not for transfers (Pare 3 below) and yet a delegate was present at the Commonwealth Meeting putting a marker down that the position

rangerment which is putint dbe considered in a effect. Could you let me know what is decided on para 2?

Pooc'1997 sh.

2.

H.K.Rpt I have talked to Clinton Leeks in H.K. Reppt, what he has said supports the first thoughts I had on the whole question,