TNAG-1581-FCO40-2155-Hong-Kong-Commercial-Crimes-Bill-1986 — Page 19

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

CONFIDENTIAL

6342

INSTANCES THE REFORMS PROPOSED COULD BE ARGUED TO BE OF BENEFIT

TO A WIDER RANGE OF CRIMINAL CASES. THIS IS A QUESTION FOR

OTHERS TO CONSIDER.

EVERY

CHANGES ARE REQUIRED IN THE PROCEDURES FOR MOBILISING THE

NECESSARY PROFESSIONAL SKILLS TO ANALYSE COMPLEX CASES.

COMPLEX FRAUD CASE SHOULD HAVE A 'CASE CONTROLLER' TO CONTROL THE

CASE FROM DISCOVERY THROUGH TO THE VERDICT. EXPANDED -

INVESTIGATORY RESOURCES WILL BE REQUIRED, AND EARLIER

INTERVENTION BY LEADING COUNSEL WORKING WITH THE CASE CONTROLLER

IS ALSO ESSENTIAL.

PENDING THE GOVERNMENT'S DECISION ON THE 1981

RECOMMENDATION OF THE ROYAL COMMISSION ON CRIMINAL PROCEDURE TO

ABOLISH COMMITTAL PROCEEDINGS, THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS AS AN INTERIM MEASURE AN ALTERNATIVE PROCEDURE DESIGNED TO BRING

SERIOUS FRAUD CASES MORE QUICKLY TO THE CROWN COURT. IT PROPOSES

THE NOMINATION OF THE TRIAL JUDGE AT AN EARLY STAGE. THE JUDGE

SHOULD BE EMPOWERED TO DISCHARGE THE DEFENDANT AT A PREPARATORY

HEARING ON THE GROUND THAT PRIMA FACIE THE EVIDENCE DOES NOT

LSUPPORT THE CHARGES IN THE INDICTMENT. PRE-TRIAL REVIEWS MUST

BE MADE EFFECTIVE AND GIVEN 'TEETH'. AN OBLIGATION SHOULD BE

PLACED UPON THE DEFENCE TO REVEAL THE NATURE OF THE DEFENCE CASE

ONCE THE PROSECUTION CASE IS DISCLOSED. THE REMUNERATION

ARRANGEMENTS FOR COUNSEL MUST REFLECT ADEQUATELY THE IMPORTANCE

OF PREPARATORY WORK.

SUBSTANTIAL REVISION OF THE RULES OF EVIDENCE IS REQUIRED

IN ORDER TO DEAL WITH THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL AND THE

DELIBERATE OBSTRUCTIONIST.

DESPITE ALL ITS SHORTCOMINGS, THE COMMITTEE FINDS TRIAL

BY JURY AN ACCEPTABLE PROCEDURE FOR THE VAST MAJORITY OF FRAUD

CASES. FOR COMPLEX FRAUD CASES FALLING WITHIN CERTAIN

GUIDELINES, THE COMMITTEE BELIEVES, WITH ONE DISSENTIENT, THAT A

DIFFERENT TYPE OF TRIBUNAL IS REQUIRED (THE 'FRAUD TRIALS

TRIBUNAL'), CONSISTING OF A JUDGE AND TWO SKILLED LAY MEMBERS.

THE COMMITTEE, WITH ONE DISSENTIENT, TOOK THE VIEW THAT THE DEFENDANT'S RIGHT OF PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE OF JURORS IS NOT

NEEDED AND SHOULD BE ABOLISHED IN FRAUD CASES. THE PROSECUTION'S

3

CONFIDENTIAL

-

1

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.