(1115
FCOAPR
CONFIDENTIAL
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
London SW1A 2AH
J Hanratty Esq
Kuala Lumpur
HKK 340/
RECEIVED IN REGISTE › 4 DEC 1986
DESK INDEX
Telephone 01-
233 3722
een Taken
Dew Hanoutty
HONG KONG CERTIFICATES OF IDENTITY
Your reference
Our reference
Date
2 December 1986
Your letter CON340/4 of 16 October to NTD has been passed to me for reply.
1.
2.
want
to know
as
For
We fully appreciate that many countries will eventually what arrangements we intend to make concerning Hong
After all, 1997 approaches. Kong Certificates of Identity as you point out, half of the ethnic Chinese population of Hong Kong are holders or potential holders of Certificates of Identity.
that reason we
on have been conducting talks this subject with the Chinese Government under the auspices of the Joint Liaison Group a body which
the Sino-British
future
to discuss the of Hong Kong
1997. resolved before
These particular
was set
up
under
on
the agreement matters that need to be talks
fruition came to
on
many
27
November
that
arrangements
for
1986 when HMG and the Government of the People's Republic of China formally
Memoranda exchanged
confirming has been reached between the two sides on the agreement
of the continued
Certificates use of Hong Kong You ill see
from the texts of these
the
W
Certificates
of
resolved
and
Identity that the
the Hong
and
has been after 1997
of documents travel
of the
People's
Identity after 30 June 1997.
Memoranda (copies enclosed) that the future status of Hong Kong
both before matter of passports and Kong Special Administrative Region Republic of China has been explained.
3.
let
me
I hope you will find the texts self-explanatory but please know if you have any further queries. I also enclose for
reference
exchanged with
the
PRC on
and a
1 1
copy
the Memoranda copies of
(see para April 1986
1 of UK Memorandum of 27 November) of the Sino-British Joint Declaration on the Question of Hong Kong (Section XIV of Annex I is relevant).
4.
Certificates
out
have not
actually been
asked about wish to make a big deal
appropriate
I note that you
as yet of Identity. We would not it consider
in situation
low key and we leave
of this questions by
but
you explaining
may
the
Malaysians. If you did decide on this
a
to
pre-empt
way
to the it to you to
CONFIDENTIAL
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.