TNAG-1560-FCO40-2124-Future-of-Hong-Kong-nationality-and-passports-Hong-Kong-(Br-1986 — Page 64

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

ZCZC

MILNAN 7773 OCMIAN 7773

RESTRICTED

PP HOKON

FM FCOLN TO HOKON

241330Z FEB

GRS 335

RESTRICTED

FM FCO

TO PRIORITY HONG KONG

TELNO 366

OF 241330Z FEBRUARY 86

273)

274

RESTRICTED

17773

Hinn Octo

ник

RECEIVED A REGISTRY

2 5FEB 1986

DESK OFFICER INDEX

REGISTRY

PA

Action Taken

YOUR TELNOS 540 AND 558: PARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS RELATING TO

HONG KONG

1. OUR PRACTICE HAS LONG BEEN TO CONSULT YOU ON AN ANSWER ONLY

WHEN WE CONSIDER THAT A PROPOSED FCO REPLY TO A PQ WITH RELEVANCE

TO HONG KONG IS IN ANY WAY CONTROVERSIAL. WE ARE OURSELVES

CONSULTED BY DEPARTMENTS OUTSIDE THE FCO ONLY WHEN THE DEPARTMENT

THAT IS DOWN TO ANSWER THE PQ CONSIDERS ITS PROPOSED REPLY TO BE

CONTROVERSIAL OR REQUIRES FACTUAL INFORMATION FROM US. WE WOULD

THEN BE ASKED FOR ADVICE, AND IF WE AGREED THAT THE REPLY WAS

CONTROVERSIAL IN HONG KONG TERMS, WOULD CONSULT YOU, AS WE

REGULARLY DO.

2. SINCE YOU HAVE RAISED THEM, IN THE FOUR INSTANCES YOU QUOTE

THE POSITION WAS AS FOLLOWS:

A) THE HOME OFFICE CONSULTED US ON THEIR REPLY, WHICH WAS

A FACTUAL ONE TO WHICH YOU COULD NOT HAVE CONTRIBUTED.

B)

ODA CONSULTED US. WE AGREED TO THEIR FACTUAL AND

UNCONTROVERSIAL REPLY. THE QUESTION WAS A VERY ODD ONE.

C) MOD DID NOT CONSULT US ON THEIR INTERIM DRAFT REPLY TO

MR CLARKE'S QUESTION. THEY HAVE SINCE CONSULTED US ON THEIR SUBSTANTIVE REPLY, WHICH IS A PURELY FACTUAL RESPONSE AND WAS, WE

1

RESTRICTED

-

277)

1

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.