TNAG-1554-FCO40-2118-Hong-Kong-Control-of-Publications-Consolidation-Ordinance-19-1986 — Page 112

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

12

out the average of 9 years put forward by Mr. S. L. Chen, may well indicate to Members that the sentences imposed by the Courts were sufficient to

deter.

of

Take next the offence of robbery. those convicted in the High Court, four offenders received 20 year sentences, thirteen offenders received sentences between 14 and 19 years, and a further 51 offenders received terms between 10 years

and 14 years.

Half of all the offenders convicted in the High Court received sentences of 8 years or

Sentences passed in the District Courts were inevitably less severe because they dealt with offences which lack the aggravating features.

more.

Even

so approximately one half of all offenders convicted of robbery were sentenced to between 3 and 6 years, while some 14% of offenders received sentences of 6 or 7 years imprisonment which is the highest that the District Court can impose. I stress that robbery covers many forms of criminal conduct, ranging from a gang of armed villains bursting into a jewellery shop to the case of a simple snatch by an unarmed youth. Given the breadth of the circumstances in each individual case, and the fact that the figures quoted by Mr. S.L. Chen include juveniles and first offenders, the Government is satisfied that offenders are appropriately punished.

Where theft is concerned, we have a lesser

offence which again involves a wide variety of circumstances of offence and offender. In the District Court most offenders received a sentence of

/...13

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.