TNAG-1553-FCO40-2117-Hong-Kong-Control-of-Publications-Consolidation-Ordinance-19-1986 — Page 221

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

CONFIDENTIAL

11.

what

if a

Hong Kong have also asked for Our assessment of

repercussions,

if any,

there might be in Westminster

controversy developed over the Ordinance. I suspect

most MPs interested in Hong Kong affairs would

support a Hong Kong Government proposal to repeal these

archaic provisions.

that

12.

On this basis, I recommend that we advise Hong Kong

that we see no difficulty in principle in proceeding with

repeal of this legislation; that they should keep us

informed of developments; and that if and when the Chinese

raise the issue we should reply on the lines of para 10 above. The draft telegram reflects these points.

:

Galoun

R.

11 February 1986

agree

A C Galsworthy

Hong Kong Department

with the argumentation above.

Both repeal, and

advance for

دا

prepared

Bg tv

telling the Chice

است سلطات not

rectors

(for the reasons stated bur, wikk detersin live) seen the

couse.

1

супе

Run

TIM RENTON

CONFIDENTIAL

1712

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.