are
of the discussion paper for public consultation. Funds available in the Government Secretariat head of expenditure for the purpose.
31
There are
no other financial implications in recommending the release of the Administration's proposals to solicit public views. When a further submission is made after the consultation period, the financial implications arising from the proposals will then be set out for
consideration.
Public reaction
32
The proliferation of pornographic magazines and their easy
accessibility to young people have aroused considerable public disquiet. Many vocal but diverse views have been expressed the idea of a tribunal to rule on obscene and violent publications. Public interest subject has been persistent and it is not expected to
33
in this abate.
Some
as a
So far media reaction has been mixed. newspapers have supported the concept of a tribunal while others have expressed the view that stricter measures to control obscene and violent publications might be used device to suppress press freedom. It may be expected that any proposal which appears to infringe upon press freedom will be vigorously resisted by the media. The intense public interest in the subject has resulted in opinion surveys being conducted by some district boards and interest groups. Campaigns have also been launched in support of stricter controls. Thus the publication of the report for public discussion will be welcomed by all interested parties. The Government may, however, be criticised for being slow to come up with firm proposals as SO many opinions on the subject have already been expressed.
Publicity
34
Subject to Members' endorsement, a general press briefing will be given when the discussion paper is ready, and District Boards, interest groups and members of the public will be asked to express their views within a two months period.
Advice sought
35
Members
are invited to advise whether the recommendation in paragraphs 28 and 29 should be accepted.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.