شکر
CONFIDENTIAL
16717
· 1
IN PARA 1, YOU SEE ADVANTAGE IN SUCH AN AGREEMENT THEN WE WOULD HAVE NO OBJECTION TO BOYD EXPLORING JAPANESE INTENTIONS IN DISCUSSION WITH THE JAPANESE CONSUL GENERAL ON 20 FEBRUARY. IN THAT EVENT, MIGHT IT NOT BE BETTER TO THINK IN TERMS OF AN AGREEMENT VALID INITIALLY FOR A LIMITED PERIOD, SAY 5 YEARS, RENEWABLE BY MUTUAL CONSENT? THE QUESTION OF CONSULTING THE CHINESE WOULD NOT THEN ARISE: WE COULD SEE HOW THE AGREEMENT WORKED AND DECIDE WHETHER IT WAS WORTH CONTINUING IT: AND IF WE DECIDED IT WAS, WE WOULD HAVE ANOTHER CHANCE TO CONSIDER THE QUESTION OF CONSULTING THE CHINESE WHEN THE AGREEMENT BECAME DUE FOR THE RENEWAL WHICH WOULD EXTEND IT BEYOND 1997.
4.
GRATEFUL IF YOU WOULD INFORM US OF THE OUTCOME OF THE
DISCUSSION.
HOWE
OCMIAN 6717
NNNN
YYYY
MAIN
MINIMAL
HKD
CRD
FED
COPIES
TO:
MR
WOOD
LEGAL
ADVISERS.
2
CONFIDENTIAL
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.