could realistically be
of criteria
the three
of
remaining at that judged countries with on-going programmes for Hong Kong. At that stage, these three countries could be urged to accept this 1.500 between them. The remaining 2,500 could then be discussed with the UNHCR with a view to seeking the help of
countries. Given the scale the remaining resettlement resettlement of these other countries it is unlikely that they will be able to take more than 1,000 of those remaining. This would leave Hong Kong with about 1,500 refugees and at that stage serious consideration could be given to resettling those remaining refugees in Hong Kong and closing down the remaining open centre at Kai Tak.
14
This possibility indicates the general direction in which the situation might develop. Much will depend upon the continuing rates of resettlement and arrivals. Even if this situation were to materialise, it would take several years, after 1986, to reduce our open centre refugee population to
zero.
15
Closed Centres. With a total refugee population of about 6,000 at the end of 1986 and an open centre population of about 3,400 with 600 living outside, approximately 2,000 refugees would remain in closed
in closed centres. This is just less than half of the present closed
closed centre population of about 4,400. If this reduction were to materialise, then it would be possible, in early 1986, to close Cape Collinson Closed Centre, which holds about 360 refugees and because of its size is expensive to operate. Consideration will also be given to closing down Argyle Street Transit Centre and to release this valuable urban site for other purposes. Argyle Transit Centre is used to accommodate refugees who are about to leave Hong Kong and Ex-China
Ex-China cases
cases pending their repatriation to China. The accommodation provided by Hei Ling Chau, Chi Ma Wan and Bowring Closed Centres during the remainder of 1986 would become more than adequate. And at the end of the year (and if the forecast proves correct) it would be possible to close yet another of the closed centres.
16
Mun
Bowring Closed
use
Centre is
a
closed
as a
centre
the
for possible site third university. It is required for road works in the Tuen
Its area.
has been opposed strongly by the Tuen Mun District Board. It is suggested that plans be made to close it down. The Chi Ma Wan Closed Centre was built in 1979 as "temporary" accommodation for Vietnamese refugees. This accommodation, though adequate, is unsuitable for refugees who have to spend a considerable length of time (more than 4 years) in Hong Kong. It is proposed that during 1986,
Correctional the
Services Department should draw up plans for the long-term use of Chi Ma Wan Closed Centre which would
short-term use be compatible with its
as a refugee
CONFIDENTIAL
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.