TNAG-1491-FCO40-2049-Future-of-Hong-Kong-General-Agreement-on-Tariffs-and-Trade-(-1986 — Page 154

which

point to I would like to draw the attention of the dom

mters of the Committec if they would be willing to agree we could change the order of the day and consider now the

question of Reservations and afterwards take up this matte of the Protobol in regard to occupied territories.

CHAIRMAN

I am entirely in the hands of the Comm

to the order in which to take up these various items,

Fert

IXXI

Bere

at el

rinor

In th

IIVI

10 par

Geber:

because I think it has coms relation to the question of Refe which have been referred to by the Delegate of Cube

We

had circulated this morning the report of the ad hoc sub-Com on relations between the Protocol of Signature and the Prod of Provisional Application. This report has not yet been the hands of the Committee for 24 hours, but as a decision report of this sub-Committes might well take the question Reservations, I would like to obtain the sense of the Commit as to whether they would first of all like to deal with the report of this sub-Committee or take up now the paragraph Final Act which refers to Reservations.

I might say that the Report of the sub-Committee is pont in Document E/PC/T/199.

Will the Committee be in accord with postponing considerartek of the Protocol deeling with reletions with Germany, Japan EDI.

Korea and taking up now the R of the sub-Committee on

Is that agreed?

Protocols.

Agreed.

Melander, the Chairman

I therefore call upon Mr. Valander

sub-Committee,

Tignes

1=1t

tos be

Lich

pster

dill o

(0068

bot out

Ι

rett

of solv

Thiob w

ittee to introduce

MELANDER (Norway):

The sub-Committee dealing

these two Protocols have come to a unanimous conclusion whi in short, amounts to the deletion completely of the Protoo0 Signature and the inclusion of the essential part thereto