of power.
But one important consideration is the rate at which the
Royal Hong Kong Police develops the capacity to look after Hong
Kong's internal security.
5. The Hong Kong Government, as you may know, plumped for expansion
of the police force as the best way of safeguarding the future
security of the Colony. We support this decision, and we are glad
that the PRC support it too. It is also the Hong Kong Government's
intention that the police should be wholly responsible for internal
security well before 1997, so that they can demonstrate their ability
to stand on their own feet and increase the likelihood of a smooth
transfer of power. We support this plan too. But this leaves
unresolved the question of exactly when the police should take over
a large proportion of the tasks currently performed by the garrison,
and what should be the size and role of the garrison thereafter.
You will find, when you get to Hong Kong, that the Government favour
a comparatively early date for the institution of full police primacy.
We think it is too early to be dogmatic
<
and even when the police
do take over responsibility for the main tasks, we believe that
there could still be an important support role for the garrison.
But I must emphasise that no decisions have been taken and the way
ahead has still to be determined.
6.
Similarly, we cannot be too definite at this stage about the
future financial arrangements for the Hong Kong Garrison or about the
future of the Brigade of Gurkhas although Mr Pollard and Mr Legge
will be happy to try and answer any questions you may have.
2
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.