- 2
which contain personal information about Madam Wong Yuen-si
and her family that should not be made public for reasons of
professional ethics. However the full reports, including the
confidential annexes, were provided to the UMELCO panel, so
that the Panel would have a complete picture of the case.
4.
The series of events between November 1985, when the
case first came to the Department's notice as a result of a
telephone call on the hot-line, and 8 May 1986, when the
decision was taken to break in to Madam Wong's flat in Kwai
Chung, were described in the Secretary for Health and
Welfare's answer on 14 May and are set out
14 May and are set out in detail in the
reports which have now been tabled. I do not propose to
repeat them today. I should like, however, to highlight
certain salient features which may help to explain the
Department's actions.
5.
The social worker in charge of the case made five
unsuccessful attempts to gain entry to the flat in order to satisfy herself as to the child's condition, and she also
sought the help of neighbours and of the Housing Department
staff in the estate. The UMELCO Panel consider that more
intensive work should have been undertaken prior to the
break-in, but that a shortage of staff and resources prevented
the necessary time from being devoted to the case.
conclusion generally accords with the view taken by the
Director of Social Welfare in her own report. She has
This
1
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.