"
CONFIDENTIAL
12294
-
OUT, IN CONNECTION WITH SHAO'S REMARKS, THAT IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES
OF HONG KONG IT IS IMPRACTICABLE TO SUPPOSE THAT WE COULD EVER
AGREE WITH THE CHINESE EXACTLY WHAT SHOULD BE SAID ON EVERY
OCCASION TO THE PRESS: HE COULD THEN REFER TO MR LU PING'S OWN
COMMENTS AS REPORTED IN THE PRESS. HE COULD ADD THAT COMMENTS
MADE TO THE PRESS ARE NOT ALWAYS ACCURATELY REPORTED.
4.
IF THE CHINESE THEN RAISE THE SCMP ARTICLE ABOUT THE EXCO
PAPER, WE AGREE THAT BOYD SHOULD SPEAK AS SUGGESTED IN YOUR TELNO
312.
5.
WE DO NOT THINK THAT IT WOULD BE WISE TO RAISE THE MIRROR
ARTICLE WITH NCNA: THEY MIGHT WELL REPLY THAT THE REPORT IS AN
INTELLIGENT AND WELL-INFORMED JOURNALISTIC WRITE-UP RATHER THAN A
LEAK OR A BRIEFING.
HOWE
OCMIAN 2294
NNNN
YYYY
HONG KONG AGREEMENT : RESTRICTED
LIMITED
HD/HKD
HD/FED
RESEARCH D (FE)
D/HD PUSD
MR WILSON
COPIES TO:
MR FIFOOT, LEGAL ADVISERS MR WOOD LEGAL ADVISERS
-2-
CONTIDENTIAL
1
ด
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.