PP HONG KONG
REFERENCE
HERE
Fco tel 789.
CONFIDENTIAL
ANKK 243/5
RECEIVED IN REGISTRY
12 JUN 1985
DESK OF FICER
INDEX
REGISTRY
vers, Taken
لوله
23702
1
!!!
GRS 300
CONFIDENTIAL
FM FCO 061728Z JUNE 85
TO PRIORITY HONG KONG
TELEGRAM NUMBER 789 OF 6 JUNE 1985
AND TO PRIORITY UKMIS GENEVA
INFO PRIORITY HANOI, WASHINGTON
MR HARTLING'S VISIT TO THE UK: 5 JUNE 1985
pa
243/5
1. THE FOLLOWING WERE THE MAIN POINTS DISCUSSED AT MR HARTLING'S
MEETING WITH MR LUCE (COPY OF FULL RECORD FOLLOWS BY BAG TO HONG
KONG AND GENEVA):
2. MR HARTLING SAID THAT THE TWO CATEGORIES OF REFUGEES IN HONG
KỌNG WHICH MOST CONCERNED HIM WERE THOSE WITH UK FAMILY LINKS AND
LONG-STAYERS. (HE DEFINED THE LATTER AS THE 5000 OR SO REFUGEES
WHO HAD ARRIVED IN HONG KONG PRIOR TO 1982). HE THOUGHT THIS
LOAD SHOULD BE SPREAD AMONG THE MAIN RESETTLEMENT COUNTRIES, WITH
THE UK TAKING THE LEAD BY ACCEPTING THE FAMILY REUNION CASES AND
A PROPORTION OF THE REST (HE SUGGESTED 20 PER CENT, IE ABOUT 1000).
3. MR HARTLING OFFERED TO ASSIST IN APPROACHING OTHER
GOVERNMENTS. HE SAID HIS DEPUTY WOULD SHORTLY BE GOING TO
AUSTRALIA, AND FELDMANN TO CANADA, AND ASKED WHAT WE WOULD LIKE
THEM TO SAY TO THESE GOVERNMENTS. MR LUCE SAID THAT WE WOULD
WELCOME ANY HELP WHICH UNHCR COULD GIVE, BUT ACCEPTED THAT IT
WOULD BE DIFFICULT TO PERSUADE OTHER COUNTRIES TO ACT UNTIL HMG HAD
REACHED A DECISION ON THE SCORRI RECOMMENDATIONS. THE CRUCIAL
MOMENT WOULD BE IMMEDIATELY AFTER PUBLICATION OF OUR REPLY TO
SCORRI, WHICH WAS LIKELY TO BE IN JULY.
4.
MR HARTLING DID NOT CRITICISE CONDITIONS IN THE CLOSED CAMPS.
HOWEVER HE EXPRESSED DOUBTS AS TO THEIR EFFECTIVENESS AS A
DETERRENT. HE CITED THE EXAMPLE OF MALAYSIA, WHICH HAD HAD
CLOSED CAMPS FOR YEARS BUT CONTINUED TO ATTRACT REFUGEES.
5. MR HARTLING SAID THAT HE WAS TO BE INTERVIEWED BY THE BBC
BEFORE RETURNING TO GENEVA. TO OUR KNOWLEDGE THERE HAVE SO FAR
1
CONFIDENTIAL
22
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.