GRS 450
CONFIDENTIAL
FM HONG KONG
TO IMMEDIATE FCO
TELNO 1875
CONFIDENTIAL'
OF 111005Z SEPTEMBER 35
INFO IMMEDIATE PEKING
TOP COPY
040/4
HKK
RECEIVED IN REGISTRY
1 1 SEP 1985
OFFICER
REGISTRY
PA
Action Taken
391
MIPT:
HONG KONG AGREEMENT: NATIONALITY ORDER IN COUNCIL.
(369)
BASED ON PARA. 6 OF YOUR TELNO 1236 WE EXPLAINED TO EXCO, IN PARA. 6 OF MEMORANDUM XCC (85) 126 DISCUSSED YESTERDAY, THAT YOU WISHED TO LEAVE ARTICLE 4(3) AS IT IS BECAUSE PROBLEMS 390
OF STATLESSNES COULD ARISE. IN PARA. 5 OF OUR TELNO 1862 WE REPORTED THAT MISS MARIA TAM ASKED FOR THIS POSSIBILITY TO BE RESEARCHED SO THAT SPECIFIC INSTANCES COULD BE CITED IN RESPONSE TO POSSIBLE ENQUIRIES FROM THE PUBLIC.
2. HAVING EXPLAINED TO EXCO, IN THE TERMS DESCRIBED ABOVE, YOUR REASONS FOR DECLINING TO AMEND THE DATE OF CESSATION OF BN (0) STATUS IN ARTICLE 4(3) AS SUGGESTED BY MISS MARIA TAM, WE REMAIN UNCLEAR AS TO YOUR PRECISE REASONS FOR REJECTING MISS TAM'S PROPOSED AMENDMENT, AND ARE CONCERNED THAT WE MIGHT NOT BE ABLE TO ANSWER PUBLIC QUERIES SATISFACTORILY IF OTHER MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MADE THE SAME QUERY. WE ARE AWARE THAT A 5DTC COULD NOT RENOUNCE BOTH BDTC AND BN (0) STATUS AT THE SAME TIME IF THAT WOULD LEAVE HIMS STATELESS. BUT WE NOTE THAT UNDER SECTION 40 OF THE 1981 ACT THE SECRETARY OF STATE MAY DEPRIVE A BDTC OF HIS BDT CITIZENSHIP IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES EVEN IF THAT WOULD LEAVE HIM STATELESS. IF STATELESS-NESS COULD ARISE FROM DEPRIVATION ANYWAY, WE FAIL TO SEE HOW POSSIBLE STATELESSNESS ARISING FROM CHANGE OF THE DATE OF CESSATION OF A PERSON'S BN(0) STATUS FROM 1 JULY 1997 TO THE DATE OF CESSATION OF THAT PERSON'S BDTC STATUS COULD BE A REASON FOR NOT AGREEING TO MISS TAM'S PRPOSED AMENDMENT. WE SHOULD BE GRATEFUL FOR YOUR CLARIFICATION OF YOUR REASONS FOR NOT AGREEING TO MISS TAM'S
CONFIDENTIAL
/PROPOSED
(392
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.