CONFIDENTIAL
29906
-
INTRODUCED TEN YEARS BEFORE THE HANDOVER DATE. (BN(0) PASSPORTS
COULD NOT, OF COURSE, BE ISSUED BEFORE THIS DATE.)
17. ARTICLE 4(2) ENABLES HONG KONG BDTCS TO ACQUIRE BN(0)
STATUS, AS A MATTER OF ENTITLEMENT.
18.
ARTICLE 4(3) IS NECESSARY TO ACCORD WITH THE WORDING OF THE
MEMORANDUM. IN ORDER TO BE ELIGIBLE TO RETAIN BN(0) STATUS A
PERSON MUST BE A BDTC ON 30 JUNE 1997. A PERSON WHO ACQUIRES
BN(0) STATUS AND SUBSEQUENTLY RENOUNCES OR IS DEPRIVED OF BDTC
STATUS BEFORE 30 JUNE WOULD NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT, AND COULD
NOT THEREFORE RETAIN BN(0) STATUS.
REMOVAL OF HONG KONG FROM LIST OF DEPENDENT TERRITORIES
19. ARTICLE 5: THIS ARTICLE DELETES HONG KONG FROM THE LIST OF
DEPENDENT TERRITORIES ON 1 JULY 1997.
PROVISIONS FOR REDUCING STATELESSNESS
20. PARAGRAPH 6 SETS OUT THE PROVISIONS AGREED BY PARLIAMENT FOR
AVOIDING OR REDUCING STATELESSNESS. THE UNDERLYING PRINCIPLE IS
THAT NO FORMER BDTC, NOR ANY CHILD BORN ON OR AFTER 1 JULY 1997
TO SUCH A PERSON, SHOULD BE STATELESS AS A RESULT OF THE
AGREEMENT. THIS PRINCIPLE WAS EXTENDED IN THE COMMITTEE STAGE IN
THE LORDS TO THE GRANDCHILDREN OF FORMER BDTCS IF THEY WOULD
OTHERWISE BE STATELESS, BY MEANS OF PROVISIONS WHICH PARALLEL
THOSE OF SECTION 17(2) TO (4) OF THE 1981 ACT.
21. ARTICLE 6(1) PROVIDES FOR THOSE BDTCS WHO HAVE NOT ACQUIRED
BN(0) STATUS, FOR WHATEVER REASON, AUTOMATICALLY TO ACQUIRE BOC
ON THAT DATE IF THEY WOULD OTHERWISE BE STATELESS. BUT THE
PROVISION NECESSARILY GOES FURTHER THAN THIS. ALTHOUGH THE
MEMORANDUM RESTRICTS THE ACQUISITION OF BN(0) STATUS TO THOSE WHO
WERE BDTCS IMMEDIATELY BEFORE 1 JULY 1997, WE NEED TO CATER FOR
THE RATHER FANCIFUL POSITION OF A PERSON WHO, HAVING ACQUIRED
BN(0) SOME YEARS PREVIOUSLY, THEN RENOUNCES BDTC. SINCE THE TWO
STATUSES ARE QUITE DISTINCT, THERE IS NOTHING TO STOP HIM DOING
THIS: HE WOULD NOT BE STATELESS ON RENUNCIATION OF BDTC BECAUSE
HE WOULD STILL HAVE BN(0) STATUS. SUCH A PERSON WOULD, FOLLOWING
RENUNCIATION OF BDTC THEREFORE REMAIN A BN(0), BUT WOULD HAVE TO
LOSE THIS ON 1 JULY 1997 UNDER ARTICLE 4(3). IF HE HAD NO OTHER
NATIONALITY, HE WOULD AT THAT POINT BECOME STATELESS. IT WOULD
5
CONFIDENTIAL
1
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.