TNAG-1383-FCO40-1831-Future-of-Hong-Kong-nationality-and-citizenship-1985 — Page 147

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

CONFIDENTIAL

29906 1

-

CONNECTION AFTER THE DEATH OF THE BDTC SPOUSE. IF THE WIDOW OR

WIDOWER IN QUESTION WERE TO REMARRY A NON-BDTC IN HONG KONG, THAT

NEW SPOUSE WOULD THEN ACQUIRE AN AVENUE TO BDTC WITH A HONG KONG

CONNECTION THROUGH THAT MARRIAGE.

9. ARTICLE 2(1)(C) CATERS FOR PERSONS BORN OUTSIDE HONG KONG TO

PARENTS SETTLED IN HONG KONG AT THE TIME OF BIRTH. (ONE

CONSEQUENCE IS THAT IT WILL PREVENT A HONG KONG BDTC OR A PERSON

SETTLED IN HONG KONG FROM RELIEVING HIS CHILDREN FROM THE LOSS OF

BDTC BY ARRANGING FOR THEIR BIRTH IN ANOTHER DEPENDENT

TERRITORY). SINCE THE TERM 'SETTLED' IN A DEPENDENT TERRITORY IS

DEFINED IN SECTION 50(2) OF THE 1981 ACT AS 'BEING ORDINARILY

RESIDENT IN

THAT TERRITORY WITHOUT BEING SUBJECT

UNDER THE IMMIGRATION LAWS TO ANY RESTRICTION ON THE PERIOD FOR

WHICH HE MIGHT REMAIN', A HONG KONG BDTC WHO LEAVES HONG KONG

TEMPORARILY STILL REMAINS SETTLED IN HONG KONG, AND IS THEREFORE

COVERED BY THIS PROVISION. SIMILARLY A HONG KONG BDTC WHO SENDS

HIS WIFE ABROAD (OR, FOR EXAMPLE, PURCHASES, SAY, CAYMAN ISLANDS

RESIDENCE STATUS FOR HER) TO HAVE A CHILD WILL NOT SUCCEED IN

RELIEVING THAT CHILD FROM LOSS BECAUSE HE HIMSELF REMAINS SETTLED

IN HONG KONG. BUT THE CHILD OF HONG KONG BDTCS WHO HAVE LEFT

HONG KONG PERMANENTLY TO SETTLE ELSEWHERE, AND ARE THEREFORE NO

LONGER SETTLED IN HONG KONG, WILL RIGHTLY AVOID THE LOSS OF BDTC

STATUS (ALTHOUGH THE PARENTS IN QUESTION WOULD PROBABLY NOT DO

SO).

10. ARTICLE 2(1)(D): THIS ARTICLE CONFORMS WITH THE WAY IN WHICH

BDTC MAY BE ACQUIRED BY DESCENT UNDER SECTION 16 OF THE BNA 1981

(IE FROM A PARENT IN HONG KONG CROWN OR DESIGNATED SERVICE).

11. ARTICLE 2(1)(E): THE GRAND PARENTAL CONNECTION IS NECESSARY

TO ACCORD WITH THE WAY IN WHICH BDTC WAS ACQUIRED IN COMMENCEMENT

UNDER SECTION 23(1)(B) OF THE 1981 ACT. IF THE PERSON IN

QUESTION HAD NO OTHER, SEPARATE, ROUTE TO BDTC THEN IT COULD BE

ARGUED THAT HE OR SHE MUST BE DEFINITION BE A HONG KONG BDTC AND

THEREFORE LIABLE TO LOSE THAT CITIZENSHIP.

12. ARTICLE 2(1)(F): THIS PROVISION IS NECESSARY TO CATER FOR

THOSE PERSONS IN CATEGORY A15 IN THE LIST ANNEXED. IT ADMITTEDLY

GIVES THE IMPRESSION OF BEING DISCRIMINATORY BETWEEN THE SEXES,

3

CONFIDENTIAL

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.