102
SECRET
HKK 040/17 HICK
NED IN BENSTHAY
4FEB 1985
GR 500
SECRET
DESKBY 0209OOZ FCO
DESK BY 04003OZ PEKING
FM HONG KONG 020445Z FEB 85
TO IMMEDIATE FCO
TELEGRAM NUMBER 269 OF 2 FEBRUARY
INFO IMMEDIATE PEKING
106
་
May
MY TELNO 260 AND PEKING TELNO 138 TO YOU: HONG KONG BILL:
NATIONALITY/PASSPORTS.
1. WE HAVE BEEN GIVEN TO UNDERSTAND THAT, IN ADDITION TO THE
POINTS COVERED BY THE DRAFT Q AND A BRIEF IN MY TEL UNDER REF,
LEGCO UNOFFICIALS WILL BE ASKING SEVERAL QUESTIONS CONCERNING
THE POSITION OF THOSE WHO ARE TO BECOME BOC'S.
*
2. THE MAIN QUESTION IS WHAT WOULD HAPPEN TO THE CHILDREN BORN
TO SUCH BOC'S. THIS IS A MATTER OF VERY GRAVE CONCERN TO NON-CHINESE
HONG KONG BDTC'S. OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE INTENTION IS THAT SUCH
CHILDREN WOULD ALSO BECOME BOC'S, ALBEIT NOT AUTOMATICALLY BUT
UNDER THE EXISTING PROVISIONS OF SCHEDULE 2 TO BNA 1981, IF THEY WOULD OTHERWISE BE STATELESS: SEE PARA 16(A) OF THE HOME OFFICE
NOTE (PAPER C) ATTACHED TO THE DRAFTING INSTRUCTIONS ON THE
HONG KONG BILL. HOWEVER, A CLOSE LOOK AT SCHEDULE 2 REVEALS THAT
THERE IS A SERIOUS SNAG. AS HONG KONG WILL HAVE CEASED TO BE A
BRITISH DEPENDENT TERRITORY, A CHILD BORN IN THE HONG KONG SAR ON OR AFTER 1 JULY 1997 TO A BOC (WHO WAS HIMSELF BORN IN THE HONG
XONG SAR ON OR AFTER 1 JULY 1997 TO A BNO OR A BOC) WOULD BE UNABLE
TO MEET THE REQUIREMENT OF PARA 4(1)(C) OF SCHEDULE 2, AND OUR
LEGAL ADVISERS ARE DOUBTFUL WHETHER THE DISCRETION PROVIDED FOR
IN PARA 6 OF SCHEDULE 2 CAN BE EXERCISED IN SUCH A WAY AS TO
DISREGARD THE TERRITORIAL CONNECTION REQUIREMENT ALTOGETHER. AT
THE SAME TIME, SUCH CHILDREN WOULD, IN OUR READING OF CHINESE NATIONALITY LAW, NOT (REPEAT NOT) ACQUIRE CHINESE NATIONALITY AUTOMATICALLY SINCE THEIR PARENTS, BEING 30C'S, ARE NEITHER
STATELESS NOR OF UNCERTAIN NATIONALITY (SEE ARTICLE 6 OF THE
CHINESE NATIONALITY LAW), AND THE CHINESE HAVE MADE IT CLEAR
THAT THEY WOULD REGARD SUCH PARENTS AS BRITISH NATIONALS.
3. IT MAY BE THAT SUCH CHILDREN COULD BE REGISTERED AS BOC'S
UNDER SECTION 27(1) OF BNA 1981, BUT SUCH REGISTRATION WOULD BE
ENTIRELY DISCRETIONARY AND A REFERENCE TO IT WOULD NOT (REPEAT
NOT) ALLAY THE CONCERN OF THE ETHNIC MINORITIES.
4. A SOLUTION WILL NEET TO BE FOUND TO THIS PROBLEM. ONE POSSIBILITY
SEEMS TO US TO BE FOR THE ORDER-IN-COUNCIL ON NATIONALITY TO PROVIDE
IN SOME WAY FOR PARA 4 OF SCHEDULE 2 TO BNA 1981 TO APPLY TO
CHILDREN BORN TO PARENTS WHO ACQUIRE BOC UNDER THE TERMS OF THE
ORDER-IN-COUNCIL. WE SHOULD BE GRATEFUL FOR YOUR URGENT CONSIDERATION
OF THIS POINT AND FOR YOU ADVICE ON WHAT RESPONSE WE SHOULD GIVE
TO THE QUESTION DURING THE LEGCO ADJOURNMENT DEBATE.
SECRET
15.
(110)
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.