TNAG-1381-FCO40-1829-Future-of-Hong-Kong-nationality-and-citizenship-1985 — Page 169

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

143

Mr Galsworthy, HKD

CONFIDENTIAL

(W43

Hong Kong Bill: Second Reading Debate: Nationality

The Secretary of State was grateful for your minute of 17 January about how we should respond to Mr Powell's amendment and when we should aim to lay an order in council in the Library of the House.

He entirely shares your view that it would be wrong and very dangerous to try to rush EXCO into accepting a draft order before they were ready. He also strongly endorses your point that if we indicated a willingness to produce the order quickly, we would simply invite pressure to include its substance in the Bill, as Mr Powell is demanding. has commented that the only reason for not including it in the Bill is that it is not ready and will not be for some time.

He

The Secretary of State is taken with the idea we discussed yesterday of accepting the UMELCO delegation's suggestion of a commitment to the House to lay the order within a given period. He suggests that there might be a problem if the specified date was too close - either before or after ratification date. From that point of view, the proposal that we should use the end of the year as our target date is probably right.

-

Pichets

18 January 1985

(P F Ricketts)

cc: PS/Mr Luce

PS/PUS

Dr Wilson Legal Advisers

CONFIDENTIAL

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.