CONFIDENTIAL
478
BILL, AND I CAN UNDERSTAND WHY THIS MIGHT BE THOUGHT DESIRABLE, THERE WOULD BE AN OPPORTUNITY TO DO SO IN ANOTHER PLACE. ENDS 3. WE AGREE THAT IT WOULD BE HELPFUL FOR YOU TO BRIEF TRUSTED EDITORS ON THIS SUBJECT, AND ARE CONTENT WITH THE POINTS IN
SECOND TUR.
4.
-
WE CONSIDER, HOWEVER, THAT IT WOULD BE HELPFUL IF YOU ALSO COVERED THE QUESTIONS OF WHETHER THE CHINESE HAVE AGREED TO THE
NEW TITLE AND WHY NO MORE OBVIOUS TITLE SUCH AS 'BRITISH NATIONAL: HONG KONG' HAS BEEN CHOSEN. WE THEREFORE SUGGEST THAT YOU SAY, ON AN UNATTRIBUTABLE BASIS, THAT THE CHINESE HAVE BEEN INFORMED OF THE NEW TITLE AS A COURTESY AND THAT THEY HAVE NOT RAISED OBJECTION. ON THE SECOND QUESTION IT MIGHT BE BEST TO SAY SIMPLY THAT IT WOULD OBVIOUSLY NOT BE APPROPRIATE TO HAVE A TITLE WHICH IMPLIED A CONSTITUTIONAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN
BRITAIN AND HONG KONG AFTER 1997.
5. WE ARE SENDING THIS FLASH IN CASE YOU RECEIVE ENQUIRIES
DURING THE DEBATE.
1
HOWE
:
HONG KONG AGREEMENT
LIMITED
HD/HKD
HD/FED
HD/PLANNING STAFF
HD/PUSD
DEP HD/PUSD
RESEARCH DEPT (MR WALKER)
PS
PS/MR LUCE
PS/PUS
SIR W HARD ING
MR WILSON
SIR J FREELAND
MR J CROWLEY, PUSD
COPIES TO: (VIA ADR)
MR ROBERTS, NEWS DEPT
MR FIFOOT, LEGAL ADVISERS MR BURROWS, LEGAL ADVISERS
MR MARTIN, ASST STAFF CABINET
OFFICE
MR CARTLEDGE, CABINET OFFICE MR COLVIN, CABINET OFFICE SIR P CRADOCK, NO 10 DOWNING ST HK GO, LONDON
CONFIDENTIAL
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.