TNAG-1377-FCO40-1825-Future-of-Hong-Kong-legislation-Hong-Kong-Bill-1985 — Page 45

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

DSR 11 (Revised)

DRAFT: minute/letter/teleletter/despatch/note

FROM:

MR LUCE

DEPARTMENT:

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

TO:

Top Secret

Secret

Confidential

Restricted

Unclassified

PRIVACY MARKING

CAVEAT.....

Christopher Murphy Esq MP

House of Commons

London SW1 OAA

SUBJECT:

TEL. NO:

TYPE: Draft/Final 1+

Reference

Your Reference

Copies to:

..In Confidence

In my speech winding up the debate on the Second Reading

of the Hong Kong Bill on 21 January, I said that I would

write to those Members whose points I did not feel that I

asked why paragraph 2(1)(b) of the

had answered.

schedule used the word "may" instead of the word "shall"

Enclosures-flag(s)...........

The word "may" is used in para 2(1)(b) because

acquisition of the new status by BDTCs is not compulsory.

It will be for former BDTCs to opt for the new status. I

can of course as sure you that there

no suggestion that

is

the Government will retain any discretion to deny that

status to any person who opts for it and satisfies the

conditions for its acquisition.

Page 45Page 46

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.