(E) THE POLITICAL OPPONENTS OF THE PRESENT SYSTEM ARE ARGUING THAT
THE BILL SHOULD NOT BE PASSED UNTIL THE NEW ELECTED MEMBERS
ARE PRESENT. IT WOULD BE VERY DANGEROUS INDEED TO CONCEDE THEIR
CLAIM THAT THE PRESENT LEGCO LACKS AUTHORITY. LEGCO MEMBERS, WHO UNANIMOUSLY SUPPORT THE BILL, ARE APPOINTED WITH THE
APPROVAL OF MINISTERS TO ADVISE GOVERNMENT ON THE BEST INTERESTS
OF HONG KONG. MINISTERS HAVE ON A NUMBER OF OCCASIONS MADE
CLEAR THEIR SUPPORT FOR UNOFFICIALS AND RELIED ON THEIR SUPPORT
FOR THE JOINT DECLARATION. FOR EXAMPLE, IN THE DEBATE IN THE
HOUSE OF COMMONS ON 15 MAY 1934 THE SECRETARY OF STATE PAID
A TRIBUTE TO THE VERY IMPORTANT CONTRIBUTION THAT UNOFFICIAL
MEMBERS MADE TO THE ADMINISTRATION AND LIFE OF HONG KONG.
(F) NOW THAT THE BILL HAS BEEN HEAVILY AMENDED, AND THERE ARE NO
MORE POINTS OF SUBSTANCE TO BE ADDRESSED IN THE REVISED BILL,
LOCAL CRITICISM HAS SWITCHED IN PART TO GENERALITIES AND
IN PART TO MATTERS WHICH GO WELL BEYOND THE BILL.
(G) FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF HONG KONG IT WOULD OF COURSE BE
MOST UNWELCOME WERE THIS QUESTION TO BECOME A POLITICAL
FOOTBALL IN THE UK.
THE GENERAL OBJECTION IS BASED ON A CALL FOR DELAY UNTIL THE NEW LEGCO MEETS (PARA (E) ABOVE). THE LEGAL POINTS RAISED BY THE
LEGAL ASSOCIATIONS HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED BY THE GROUP OF UNOFFICIALS.
OTHERS E.G. THE PROPOSED REVIEW OF STANDING ORDERS AND REPLACEMENT
OF THE GOVERNOR AS A SPEAKER, GO BEYOND THE PRESENT BILL (THE LATTER POINT IS IN ANY CASE SCHEDULED FOR REVIEW IN 1987: SEE PARAS 34 TO 36 OF THE WHITE PAPER).
3. A COPY OF THE SUBMISSION BY MEMBERS OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION
(1.E. JUSTICE, THE LAW SOCIETY AND THE BAR ASSOCIATION) HAS BEEN
SENT TO YOU BY FACSIMILE THROUGH THE HONG KONG GOVERNMENT OFFICE
IN LONDON.
YOUDE
LIMITED
HKD
PS
PS/MR LUCE
SIR W HARDING MR WILSON
ཉ
CONFIDENTIAL
COPIES TO:
MR FI FOOT, LEGAL ADVISERS
HKGO, LONDON
!
Page 30Page 31
:..
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.