WOULD CERTAINLY HAVE BEEN GIVEN.
- 2 -
ONCLUDE, ON
BUT CAREFUL CONSIDERATION LED THE POLICE TO CONCLUDE, ON
REASONABLE GROUNDS, THAT THIS WAS NOT NECESSARY. THE POLICE WERE
QUICKLY ABLE TO ESTABLISH A LINK BETWEEN THE TWO ATTEMPTS, THE LACK
OF SOPHISTICATION OF THE CULPRITS, THE FACT THAT THE AFFECTED DRINKS
APPEARED TO BE IN ONE LOCATION, AND, MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL, THE MINIMAL
QUANTITIES OF ADULTERANT FOUND. IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, IT WAS JUDGED
THAT PREMATURE PUBLICITY WOULD ONLY HAVE PLAYED INTO THE HANDS OF THE
CULPRITS BY CREATING UNNECESSARY PUBLIC ALARM AND IMPROVING THE CHANCES
OF A SUCCESSFUL EXTORTION.
FINALLY, I WOULD ADD THAT WORLD EXPERIENCE SHOWS A
DISTRESSING TENDENCY FOR IMITATIVE OR "COPYCAT" CRIMES TO RESULT FROM
THE PUBLICITY GIVEN TO CASES OF THIS SORT.
ACCORDINGLY, THE LESS PUBLICITY THE BETTER WHERE. THERE IS
NO SIGNIFICANT THREAT TO PUBLIC HEALTH.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.